News14 min read

Generic Peptide Drugs: Biosimilar Pipeline

The most prescribed drugs in the world are peptides — and their patents are starting to expire. [Semaglutide](/peptides/semaglutide-complete-pharmacology-guide/) loses patent protection in several major markets in 2026.

The most prescribed drugs in the world are peptides — and their patents are starting to expire. Semaglutide loses patent protection in several major markets in 2026. Tirzepatide faces its first patent challenges the same year. Dozens of generic manufacturers are preparing to enter the market. But making a generic peptide is not like making a generic aspirin. This article explains the regulatory pathways, the patent timelines, the companies lining up, and what it all means for pricing and access.


Table of Contents


Generic vs. Biosimilar: Why the Distinction Matters for Peptides

When a small-molecule drug like atorvastatin (Lipitor) goes off patent, generic manufacturers can produce chemically identical copies. The FDA approves these through Abbreviated New Drug Applications (ANDAs) that require only bioequivalence studies — proof that the generic is absorbed into the bloodstream at the same rate and extent as the original.

Peptides do not fit neatly into that framework.

Semaglutide is a 31-amino-acid peptide with a fatty acid chain attached at a specific position. It is a biologic — produced using recombinant DNA technology in engineered yeast cells (Novo Nordisk uses Saccharomyces cerevisiae). When patent protection expires, competing versions are technically biosimilars, not generics. The approval pathway is different and more demanding.

A biosimilar must demonstrate "high similarity" to the reference product through extensive analytical characterization, comparative animal studies, and often clinical trials. The standard is not identical chemical composition — it is that any differences do not produce clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy.

This distinction matters practically because:

  • Development costs for biosimilars run $100-300 million, versus $1-5 million for small-molecule generics
  • Development timelines are 5-8 years for biosimilars, versus 2-3 years for generics
  • Manufacturing complexity is orders of magnitude higher
  • Price discounts are typically 15-35% for biosimilars, versus 80-90% for small-molecule generics

However, there is a twist: some manufacturers plan to produce semaglutide through total chemical synthesis rather than recombinant methods. A fully synthetic peptide could potentially qualify for the traditional generic (ANDA) pathway rather than the biosimilar pathway — a regulatory question that has not yet been definitively settled.

Semaglutide Patent Expiration Timeline

Semaglutide's patent landscape is a patchwork that varies dramatically by country.

Where Patents Expire in 2026

Country/RegionPatent ExpiryStatus
CanadaJanuary 2026Patent protection reportedly lost due to missed maintenance fee
ChinaMarch 2026Domestic manufacturers preparing for launch
India2026Multiple generic manufacturers in development
Brazil2026Generic filings underway

Novo Nordisk's loss of its Canadian patent is particularly notable. Reports indicate the company missed a routine maintenance fee payment, effectively forfeiting patent protection years earlier than necessary. This was described in Science magazine as "Novo Nordisk's Canadian mistake" — and it opened the door for generic manufacturers to enter Canada's semaglutide market immediately.

Where Patents Hold Through 2031+

Country/RegionCore Patent ExpiryExtended Protection
United StatesDecember 5, 2031 (with Patent Term Adjustment)20+ additional patent families covering formulations and dosing
European Union~2031 (with Supplementary Protection Certificates)Additional method-of-use and formulation patents

In the U.S., while the main compound patent for semaglutide is set to expire around 2032, Novo Nordisk holds over 20 additional patent families protecting different aspects of the drug — formulations, dosing methods, delivery devices, and methods of treatment. Generic entry in the U.S. market is not expected before 2031 at the earliest.

The Patent Cliff in Context

The year 2026 is part of a broader pharmaceutical patent cliff. Industry analyses estimate that approximately $200-236 billion in annual drug sales across dozens of medications will face potential generic or biosimilar entry by the end of the decade. Semaglutide is the largest single product in this wave.

IQVIA estimates that at least one in three people living with obesity worldwide resides in a country where semaglutide is available off-patent in 2026. This is a massive population that could gain access to affordable versions of the drug.

Tirzepatide Patent Protection: Longer Runway

Tirzepatide's patent situation is fundamentally different from semaglutide's — and much more secure for Eli Lilly.

Eli Lilly has filed 53 U.S. patent applications and been granted 16 patents related to Mounjaro and Zepbound. The key dates:

MilestoneDate
First eligible patent challenge (NCE-1)May 13, 2026
Composition of matter patent expiry2036
Formulation patents expiry2039
Full patent protection (including follow-ons)~2041
Estimated earliest generic launchDecember 30, 2041

May 13, 2026 marks the first date a generic manufacturer can file an ANDA with a Paragraph IV certification challenging a tirzepatide patent. But "can file a challenge" is very different from "can launch a generic." The actual composition patent does not expire until 2036, and formulation patents extend protection through 2039.

The earliest legal challenge was filed on May 22, 2025, by Empower Pharmacy against patent US9474780. But even successful patent challenges face years of litigation before generic products reach market.

For practical purposes, generic tirzepatide is a mid-2030s event at the earliest. Investors and healthcare planners should not expect meaningful biosimilar competition to Mounjaro or Zepbound before 2036.

Companies Building Generic Semaglutide

The race to produce generic semaglutide is global. Here are the key players:

Sandoz

Sandoz has been the most vocal about its plans. CEO Richard Saynor told Bloomberg the company would use Canada as a launchpad, citing the absence of a valid Novo GLP-1 patent as "a clear green light." Sandoz has deep biosimilar expertise — it is the world's largest biosimilar manufacturer — and its operational infrastructure positions it for rapid entry once patent barriers fall.

Indian Generic Manufacturers

India is the world's pharmacy for affordable medicines, and its major generic companies are all in the race:

  • Lupin: Developing both injectable and tablet forms of semaglutide for India and South Africa, with a 2026 launch target. Executives told investors the Indian semaglutide market could be worth $1 billion per year.
  • Dr. Reddy's Laboratories: Active development program
  • Biocon: Leveraging its biosimilar expertise (the company already manufactures biosimilar insulin)
  • Sun Pharma, Cipla, Aurobindo Pharma, Zydus: All reported to be scaling up manufacturing and regulatory filings

Chinese Manufacturers

Hangzhou Jiuyuan Gene Engineering (Huadong Medicine) is expected to be among the first to launch a semaglutide biosimilar in China after the March 2026 patent expiry. China's domestic biosimilar industry has grown rapidly, and several other manufacturers are reportedly in development.

Global Scale

Plans are in place to launch generic semaglutide (both injectable and oral forms) in 87 countries starting in 2026, focusing first on India, Canada, Brazil, Turkey, and other emerging markets pending local patent expiry.

The Manufacturing Challenge

Making a follow-on semaglutide is not straightforward, regardless of which regulatory pathway it takes.

Novo Nordisk's Production Method

Novo Nordisk uses a recombinant yeast-based fermentation method to produce the semaglutide peptide backbone, followed by chemical modification to attach the fatty acid side chain that extends the drug's half-life. This is a complex, multi-step bioprocess that requires significant expertise in both fermentation biology and synthetic chemistry.

The Synthetic Alternative

Most generic manufacturers plan to produce semaglutide through total chemical synthesis — building the peptide amino acid by amino acid using solid-phase peptide synthesis (SPPS), then attaching the fatty acid linker chemically. This avoids the need for yeast fermentation entirely.

The advantage: chemical synthesis is more reproducible and easier to scale than bioprocessing. The disadvantage: a 31-amino-acid peptide is near the upper limit of what SPPS can reliably produce at commercial scale with acceptable purity. Impurity profiles may differ between synthetic and recombinant versions.

Quality and Consistency

The technical complexity of manufacturing GLP-1 peptides is a genuine barrier to entry. Peptide drugs require:

  • Precise sequence fidelity (one wrong amino acid and the drug does not work)
  • Correct three-dimensional folding
  • Proper chemical modification (the fatty acid chain on semaglutide)
  • Extremely high purity (typically >98%)
  • Stable formulation in the final dosage form
  • Cold-chain storage and distribution

Not every generic manufacturer can meet these requirements. The companies most likely to succeed are those with existing peptide or biosimilar manufacturing capabilities.

Regulatory Pathways: FDA, EMA, and the Synthetic Peptide Problem

The U.S. Approach

In the U.S., how a follow-on semaglutide is classified depends on how it is manufactured:

  • Recombinant production: The follow-on product would be classified as a biosimilar and approved through the 351(k) pathway under the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA). This requires extensive analytical, preclinical, and potentially clinical studies demonstrating biosimilarity.

  • Synthetic production: A fully chemically synthesized peptide could potentially be submitted as an ANDA (abbreviated new drug application) under the standard generic pathway, or as a full NDA (new drug application) with a reference to the original product. The FDA's determination depends on the impurity profile comparison.

In October 2025, the FDA released a landmark draft guidance that could redefine how biosimilarity is demonstrated. The updated guidance signals a shift away from requiring comparative clinical trials as a default, recognizing that advanced analytical methods can demonstrate similarity more precisely and efficiently. This could cut biosimilar development time and cost roughly in half.

The European Approach

Europe has a distinct problem. Synthetically produced follow-on peptide products are not eligible for the EU's dedicated biosimilar regulatory framework. Instead, they must be approved through either the traditional generic pathway or the hybrid application pathway. The EMA released a new draft guideline on synthetic peptides' chemistry, manufacturing, and controls (CMC) requirements in 2025 to address this gap.

The Practical Impact

These regulatory distinctions affect timelines and costs. If a synthetic semaglutide can qualify as a standard generic in the U.S. (ANDA pathway), development costs drop dramatically and the path to market shortens. If it must go through the biosimilar pathway, the first approved generic semaglutide in the U.S. is likely a 2032-2033 event even after patents expire.

Pricing Implications

What We Know from Other Biosimilar Markets

In countries where semaglutide goes off-patent in 2026, analysts project price reductions of 60-80% compared to current branded pricing. This is higher than the typical 15-35% discount seen with U.S. biosimilars, reflecting the competitive dynamics of markets like India and Brazil where multiple generic manufacturers will compete simultaneously.

Context: Current Pricing After TrumpRx

The U.S. pricing landscape has already shifted. Under the TrumpRx agreement, Medicare prices for Ozempic, Wegovy, Mounjaro, and Zepbound dropped to $245 per month with a $50 copay for beneficiaries. This represents a 60-70% reduction from prior list prices.

When generic competition eventually arrives in the U.S. (post-2031), prices will fall further. But the TrumpRx deal means the U.S. price floor is already much lower than it was — which narrows the margin available to generic competitors and may reduce the financial incentive for some biosimilar developers.

Global Access Impact

For the world's population, the 2026 patent expirations matter enormously. A month's supply of branded Ozempic costs $900+ in the U.S. (pre-discount) but would likely cost $50-150 as a generic in India. For countries where healthcare systems cannot afford branded pricing, generic semaglutide represents the difference between access and no access.

The market math: India has an estimated 101 million people with diabetes and 70 million with obesity. At generic pricing, semaglutide could become affordable for tens of millions who currently have no pharmaceutical option.

The Patent Thicket Strategy

Both Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly use a strategy called "patent thickets" — filing dozens of overlapping patents that create layered protection extending years beyond the original compound patent.

How It Works

The original compound patent protects the molecular structure. But companies also patent:

  • Formulations: The specific concentrations, buffers, and stabilizers in the final product
  • Dosing methods: How the drug is dosed and titrated
  • Delivery devices: The pen injectors, auto-injectors, or other hardware
  • Manufacturing processes: Specific production methods
  • Methods of treatment: Using the drug for specific conditions (obesity, MASH, cardiovascular risk reduction)
  • Combination therapies: Pairing the drug with other agents

Novo Nordisk has 20+ patent families around semaglutide. Eli Lilly has 53 patent applications around tirzepatide. Each additional patent creates another legal barrier that generic manufacturers must navigate.

The I-MAK Analysis

The nonprofit I-MAK published a report documenting how GLP-1 drug makers have used "follow-on patents for minor modifications" to extend market exclusivity far beyond original patent terms. The report argues this constitutes "pharmaceutical patent abuse" that drives health inequities by keeping prices artificially high.

Recent confidential legal settlements between Novo Nordisk and several generic manufacturers suggest a pattern of managed entry — negotiated agreements that allow generic launch at specific dates and under specific conditions, rather than sudden competitive disruption. This is a common pattern across the pharmaceutical industry and typically results in generic entry somewhat earlier than patent expiry but later than a successful patent challenge would allow.

The India and Emerging Market Opportunity

India's biosimilar market is estimated to grow from $184 million in 2026 to $1.02 billion by 2035 at a 21% CAGR. The peptide segment is expected to grow even faster, driven primarily by semaglutide generics.

The strategic importance of India goes beyond its domestic market:

  • Indian generic manufacturers supply medications to 200+ countries
  • India produced 20% of the world's generic drug supply by volume in 2024
  • Indian companies have extensive experience navigating regulatory approvals across diverse markets
  • Manufacturing costs in India are 30-60% lower than in the U.S. or Europe

For semaglutide specifically, the Indian market opportunity is estimated at $1 billion per year in domestic sales alone. Add export markets in Southeast Asia, Africa, Latin America, and the Middle East, and the total addressable market for Indian generic manufacturers is multiples of that.

Brazil, Turkey, and other emerging markets where patents expire in 2026 will serve as additional early-launch markets, providing revenue and manufacturing scale before the much larger U.S. and European markets open up in the 2030s.

What About Other Peptide Drugs?

Liraglutide (Victoza/Saxenda)

Liraglutide, Novo Nordisk's earlier GLP-1 drug, has already lost patent protection in most markets. Generic liraglutide is available in several countries, and biosimilar versions have been approved in India and other emerging markets. Liraglutide's patent journey provides a preview of what semaglutide generic competition will look like — but with higher stakes due to semaglutide's much larger market.

Dulaglutide (Trulicity)

Eli Lilly's dulaglutide faces patent expirations in the late 2020s. However, the drug's market is declining as tirzepatide captures share, making the biosimilar opportunity less attractive.

Other GLP-1 Peptides in the Pipeline

As new peptides like retatrutide and CagriSema launch, they will reset the patent clock. Part of the innovators' strategy is to transition patients from older drugs (semaglutide, tirzepatide) to newer, patent-protected alternatives before generic competition arrives. This "product lifecycle management" is standard pharmaceutical strategy and helps explain why both Novo Nordisk and Eli Lilly are investing heavily in next-generation drugs.

The broader peptide therapeutics market is projected to reach $49.68 billion in 2026. As each successive wave of peptide drugs eventually loses patent protection, the biosimilar pipeline will continue to grow.

FAQ

When will generic Ozempic be available in the United States?

Not before 2031 at the earliest. The core U.S. patent (with Patent Term Adjustment) extends to December 5, 2031, and Novo Nordisk holds over 20 additional patent families that could extend protection further. Even after patent expiry, biosimilar development and FDA approval take 2-3 additional years.

Are generic peptide drugs the same as the brand-name version?

Biosimilar peptides are "highly similar" but not identical to the reference product. Small differences in the manufacturing process can produce slight variations in the peptide's structure, impurity profile, or post-translational modifications. Regulatory agencies require extensive testing to demonstrate that these differences do not produce clinically meaningful differences in safety or efficacy.

Will generic semaglutide be cheaper?

In countries where patents expire in 2026 (Canada, India, China, Brazil), analysts project 60-80% price reductions compared to branded semaglutide. In the U.S., the TrumpRx pricing deal has already reduced the Medicare price to $245/month, so the incremental savings from future generic entry will be smaller — but still meaningful, potentially bringing prices to $50-100/month.

What is the difference between a generic and a biosimilar?

A generic drug is chemically identical to the original and approved through an abbreviated pathway. A biosimilar is "highly similar" to a reference biologic with "no clinically meaningful differences" — it is approved through a more rigorous pathway that may include clinical studies. Peptide drugs sit awkwardly between these categories: they are technically biologics, but some manufacturers plan to produce them synthetically, potentially qualifying for the generic pathway.

Which companies are making generic semaglutide?

Major players include Sandoz (using Canada as a launchpad), Lupin, Dr. Reddy's, Biocon, Sun Pharma, Cipla, Aurobindo, Zydus (all targeting India and emerging markets), and Hangzhou Jiuyuan/Huadong Medicine (targeting China). Plans exist for generic semaglutide launches in 87 countries starting in 2026.

Will Novo Nordisk fight generic competition in court?

Yes — patent litigation is expected and has already begun. The company's strategy involves patent thickets (dozens of overlapping patents), legal action against challengers, and confidential settlement agreements with some generic manufacturers for managed market entry at specific dates.

The Bottom Line

The semaglutide biosimilar wave is real, but its timing varies dramatically by where you live. For patients in Canada, India, China, Brazil, and other markets where patents expire in 2026, affordable alternatives could arrive within months. For U.S. and European patients, the branded product will maintain exclusivity through at least 2031 — though the TrumpRx pricing deal has already dramatically reduced the sticker price.

The regulatory questions around synthetic peptide generics remain unresolved. If the FDA allows synthetically produced semaglutide through the faster ANDA pathway, generic competition in the U.S. could arrive sooner and cheaper. If biosimilar pathways are required, the timeline extends and costs remain higher.

What is clear: the GLP-1 drug class is too large and too important to remain the exclusive domain of two companies forever. The global GLP-1 market is headed toward $470 billion in cumulative U.S. revenue by 2030. Generic manufacturers can see those numbers. They are investing accordingly.

The question is not whether generic GLP-1 peptides will arrive. It is when, at what price, and through which regulatory doors.

References

  1. Labiotech. "Semaglutide patent expiry opens door to GLP-1 generics in Canada." 2025.
  2. CZ App. "Ozempic's Patent Protection Starts to Expire in 2026. What Next?" 2026.
  3. Science (AAAS). "Novo Nordisk's Canadian Mistake." 2025.
  4. Chemical & Engineering News. "Looming GLP-1 drug patent expirations draw generics firms." December 2025.
  5. DrugPatentWatch. "When will the patents on MOUNJARO expire?" 2026.
  6. DrugPatentWatch. "When do the patents on ZEPBOUND expire?" 2026.
  7. I-MAK. "The Heavy Price of GLP-1 Drugs: How Financialization Drives Pharmaceutical Patent Abuse and Health Inequities." 2025.
  8. Rubix Life Sciences. "Biosimilar Development in 2026 and Beyond." 2026.
  9. PMC. "Synthetic polypeptides using a biologic as a reference medicinal product -- the European landscape of regulatory approvals." PMC11046703.
  10. GreyB. "Mounjaro patent expiration: Drug patents expiring in 2036." 2025.
  11. GlobeNewsWire. "India Biosimilars Market Trends and Forecasts 2026-2035." February 2026.
  12. Peptide Drug Summit 2026. "New FDA Rules Are Reshaping the Peptide Industry." 2026.